home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu.tar
/
ftp.cs.arizona.edu
/
icon
/
newsgrp
/
group00a.txt
/
000114_icon-group-sender _Mon May 22 08:02:27 2000.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2001-01-03
|
1KB
Return-Path: <icon-group-sender>
Received: (from root@localhost)
by baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id IAA06633
for icon-group-addresses; Mon, 22 May 2000 08:01:21 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <200005221501.IAA06633@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU>
From: corre@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (Alan D Corre)
X-Newsgroups: comp.lang.icon
Subject: Re: Is Anyone Working On A Unicode Version Of Icon?
Date: 22 May 2000 04:21:06 GMT
To: icon-group@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
Errors-To: icon-group-errors@optima.CS.Arizona.EDU
Status: RO
In article <200005171922.MAA09657@baskerville.CS.Arizona.EDU> Cary Coutant
<cary@cup.hp.com> writes:
>
>At the time, I was just copying the idea of a bytecode interpreter from
>the Pascal p-system. Little did I realize that Sun had yet to "invent"
>bytecode!
This prompts me to ask a question that has been bothering me for some time,
and to which I would appreciate a reply that is not overly technical. I used
Apple Pascal what seems like eons ago. It was a really nice system, invented
by Ken Bowles, if I remember correctly. My question is, why is there so much
fuss about Java working across different platforms? Was not the p-system a
"virtual machine" which could function in just that way?
--
Alan D. Corre
Emeritus Professor of Hebrew Studies
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
http://www.uwm.edu/~corre/